Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 29,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2021, 8:32 am
Green v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:35 am
The most likely source for the offending quote, if true, was the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision on executive power in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:22 pm
United Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:49 am
In a remarkably detailed and reasoned decision, Justice NeMoyer of Supreme Court, Erie County dissects the holding of Carvalho v New Rochelle Hosp. 53 AD2d 635 [2d Dept 1976]. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens, a dissenter to the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
In the 1990 case of Burnham v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Alito, as well as Chief Justice John Roberts, pushed the plaintiffs’ attorney, Cecilia Wang of the ACLU, on this point. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
As Justice Thomas notes, the 2019 Knick decision specifically refers to "'the self-executing character' of the Takings Clause 'with respect to compensation.'" In addition, even if property owners are allowed to pursue claims in state court, it is important for victims of violations of federal constitutional rights to have access to federal courts, as well, a principle upheld by the Supreme Court's important Takings… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
The Supreme Court of the United States declined today to end the judicial practice of deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations in “friend of the court” briefs filed with a court in Christopher v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
The case before the court, State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:23 am
Supreme Court today handed down its anticipated decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 5:57 pm
As well as gives one a keen sense of the displeasure that courts sometimes take towards pro se litigation. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
I have a question about (3) for those who think the Supreme Court will or very well might strike down the mandate: How do you explain Chief Justice Roberts’ vote and assignment in Comstock? [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:25 am
The bench was relatively quiet for yesterday morning’s argument in Henson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
The Court, interpreting People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm
Finally, the justices also agreed to take on a trio of cases – Advocate Health Care v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
In today’s International Court of Justice judgment in the case of Croatia v. [read post]
