Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 2501 - 2520 of 29,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 12:30 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Five Justices of the Supreme Court recognized this last term in two decisions, Lafler v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:23 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court today handed down its anticipated decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:03 am by Karin Johnson
  [1] Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration of the case. [2] In re Quality Stores, Inc., 693 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2012). [3] CSX Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 1:52 pm
The majority and the concurring justice disagree somewhat on the reasons why. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
Tossh and Eleonora (centre), together with Max (L) and Kemi (R)Tuesday 26th March was an eventful day for copyright in the European Union because the EU Parliament also adopted the Digital Single Market Directive (DSM Directive).However, the main reason why it was an important day was because our own Kat Eleonora Rosati held the official book launch for her new book, Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union, at the London offices of Bird & Bird LLP.The… [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am by Ronald Mann
ShareJustice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion for a unanimous court Thursday in Cantero v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:24 am by Stefanie Levine
First Concurrence Justice Breyer (joined by Justice Scalia and Justice Alito) gave a concurring opinion which began with the statement “I join the Court’s opinion in full. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 10:09 am by Josh Blackman
 Does Justice Thomas think that lower courts now have a green light to treat Hill v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In a remarkably detailed and reasoned decision, Justice NeMoyer of Supreme Court, Erie County dissects the holding of Carvalho v New Rochelle Hosp. 53 AD2d 635 [2d Dept 1976]. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
") Mr Justice Arnold's reasons for a referral are set out in paragraphs 93 pp:93 In the particular circumstances of this case, I concluded that the better course was to refer questions to the Court of Justice now, for the following reasons. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:21 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Seeing how the Supreme Court Justices, themselves members of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, deal with this issue will be very interesting indeed. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 11:47 am by Amy Howe
In 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case and then sent it back to the lower court for another look in light of Ziglar v. [read post]