Search for: "Williams v. Downes"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 4,030
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm
The Council takes the view that homeless applicants will not jump to the top of the housing queue with the result that people who are overcrowded or badly housed for medical or social reasons move down the list. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:13 am
District Court Judge William M. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:13 am
District Court Judge William M. [read post]
Second Circuit Rejects Child Pornography Appeal Arguing Defendant Requested a Lawyer – U.S. v. Oehne
31 Oct 2012, 3:22 pm
A defendant who didn’t make that request clearly enough was unsuccessful in his appeal in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Jenkins’s new biography of Chief Justice Rehnquist, The Partisan: The Life of William Rehnquist. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
(11-820), on retroactivity of the decision in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
As of now, the 1969 Supreme Court decision of Tinker v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:17 pm
William (V - Western Michigan)Tuttle, The Rev. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Friday a Hinds County jury rendered a $100,000 verdict Friday in Marble v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
In Lavan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Pressure can take many forms: bribes, threats, manipulative appeals to trust or a simple refusal to back down. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Cts: §1322(b)(2) doesnt bar ch 13 dbtr from stripping off wholly unsec lien on princip. resid. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Fisette-8-BAP-Schermer-8-29-11.pdf … B-DE won't grant leave to amend cplt to add 39 tsfs that cant be reconciled to transactions in the original complaint. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PowermateHolding-BK-D-Del-Gross-8-18-11.pdf … B-DE: Amended cplt alleging more pref. transfers may relate back… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
In Holden v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:44 pm
Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
(William McBride, Tax Policy Blog). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
And surely states have never had proper authority to shut down political discourse even though the First Amendment does not expressly limit states. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
The justices might readily concede the relevance of, say, William Treanor’s writings on the Takings Clause (e.g., here) or a study of Pumpelly v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:44 am
Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 (1968) and King v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:49 am
Last week, in Berrington v. [read post]
