Search for: "Wilson, Appeal of" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
Wilson was sentenced to 10 years in prison and required to register as a sex offender, though he was released after serving two years following an appeal to the state supreme court. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  That issue is presently the subject of appeals in Rebel’s case and Lloyd Rayney’s case. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:11 am by tekEditor
Lead authors of the paper are grad student Caroline Runyan and postdoc Nathan Wilson. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
This appeal concerns a regulation promulgated by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, purporting to interpret the federal prohibition on machineguns as extending to bump stocks. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:04 pm by KC Johnson
There’s no word on the fate of Duke’s appeal of the Beaty motion-to-dismiss ruling, which Judge Beaty has allowed to indefinitely delay discovery. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm by emagraken
However, the case law is binding on me, and can only be construed differently by the Court of Appeal:  see Baart v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:04 am by Joe Koncelik
But Shelley Wilson of the Ohio Department of Taxation says they were wrong... [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:45 am by M Bates
Wilson was absolutely correct.While I digress into anecdotal evidence, now retired ACJ Brian Stevenson was always touting the statistics of how many cases the Provincial Court (Criminal) Division was able to process every year. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit asking the court to review the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:44 am by Kara OBrien
Click here for the full Wilson Sonsini publication. [1] See http://wsgr.com/WSGR/Display.aspx? [read post]
8 May 2008, 11:18 am
Harris County ADA Roe Wilson is about to speak. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
 Sec. 33.07 fails on both fronts. . . .Because the Court has found Section 33.07 of the Penal Code unconstitutionally overbroad and vague, it is not necessary to reach the Applicant's third point that the statute unduly burdens interstate commerce.Ex parte Maddison, supra.The Court of Appeals then began its analysis, respectively, of the two Constitutional arguments Maddison made in his appeal: (i) the statute was unconstitutionally overbroad; and (ii) it… [read post]