Search for: "v. "
Results 2501 - 2520
of 493,757
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
For example, in the 2016 Matal v. [read post]
Precedential No. 18 (Part I): Fraud! TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel BLOOKE Registration for Bicycles
12 Aug 2024, 3:37 am
Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:15 am
” In SEC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:02 am
Last week, in Max Royal LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:19 am
United StatesBook People Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:00 pm
Liberties Union v Village of Freeport [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
”[7] By “traditional notions,” the Adopting Release refers to other SEC regulations and relevant Supreme Court case law (in particular, TSC Industries v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
”In that case, Hoffa v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 3:55 pm
Read the Petition: Zebra Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:53 pm
Meanwhile, the US Supreme Court last year rejected the authority of the administration to cancel student loans in their entirety, ruling in Biden v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Ginsberg (ADA) Merits brief in Brown v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am
ZRR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Bexley (2024) EWHC 2073 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Bexley’s contention that temporary accommodation offered to ZRR under s.190 Housing Act 1996 was suitable and its duty was discharged when ZRR refused that accommodation. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 10:42 am
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 10:23 am
Under the California Supreme Court case Brown v Superior Court (1984) case, the special provisions of this FEHA venue law “control in cases involving FEHA claims joined with non-FEHA claims arising from the same facts. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential ruling in Unification Technologies LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential ruling in Unification Technologies LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court held this order was constitutional in Korematsu v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
Quant à l’utilisation de 3 points d’exclamation dans le récit portant sur le moyen de défense de l’appelant relatif au premier événement délictuel, il s’agit d’une incongruité fâcheuse. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 3:38 am
We have previously discussed controversial sentences handed down in cases involving rioters on January 6th, including sentencing orders that, in my view, violate First Amendment rights. [read post]