Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 6,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 3:29 am
When Orin Kerr posted about a survey of George Washington Law School alumni, noting the elective course that proved most useful, the winner was astounding: 1. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As that well-known legal wag Orin Kerr put it, why bother? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:17 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Kappos v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) The Hill recently named me “the unofficial emcee of Washington’s new favorite parlor game: guess the leaker,” so I figured it was time for an update on the latest in leaking. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:26 am
In an upcoming law review article, Orin Kerr plans to argue that the subjective expectation of privacy prong of Katz is dead. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
(Orin Kerr) The Reply Brief in the Court’s only major Fourth Amendment case this term, the text-messaging case City of Ontario v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
Posted by: Orin Kerr | Apr 5, 2012 12:19:01 AM At PrawfsBlawg, where I think Dan Markel has banned me for life for violating his comment policy of only praising scholars, a post by Michael J.Z. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 6:41 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses oral argument in the Rodriguez case, which apparently departed from its stated issue (how long after the completion of a traffic stop may a person be detained for the purpose of conducting a dog sniff). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
(Orin Kerr) The comment thread to yesterday’s post on ex ante restrictions for computer warrants led to some interesting questions, and it also suggested that it might be helpful to explain the historical role of warrants, the particularity requirement, and magistrates, in order to understand how ex ante restrictions strongly depart from the historical norm. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
Orin Kerr has written an interesting post assessing the legality of the search. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Norris v United States [2010] UKSC 9 SC (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Judge, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr) 24 February 2010 In determining whether interference with an individual’s right to a family life was justified to achieve the aim of extradition, the court should not consider whether the circumstances were exceptional but should consider whether the consequences were exceptionally serious SUMMARY The appellant had recently retired… [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:53 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr provides a copy of the report of the Ad Hoc Committee To Review The Criminal Justice Act, of which he was a member. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:59 pm
(Ilya Somin) In response to my post arguing that Chief Justice Roberts’ vote in the individual mandate decision failed to enhance the Supreme Court’s legitimacy, co-blogger Orin Kerr argues that Roberts may have been motivated by a different definition of legitimacy, one seemingly unrelated to popularity: If Roberts is thought to have been influenced by public pressure, though, wouldn’t that pressure push him to strike down the mandate, not uphold it? [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) A few readers have flagged a new district court decision, Clements-Jeffrey v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:33 am
(Orin Kerr) I blogged a lot about this topic a few years ago when the Boucher case was pending; although an appeal was filed in that case in the First Circuit, the appeal was dropped so the appellate court never decided it. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:02 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr posts about a decision, State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:29 am
Via Orin Kerr at Volokh Conspiracy, the town of Henry, Tennessee has come to realize that its fortunes may be tied to a dog. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
Some of the academics who ponder such things, like Dan Solove and Orin Kerr, tried to come up with competing theories and approaches that would produce an alternative to the two prevailing conflicts, the Katz Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test and the Third-Party Doctrine. [read post]
