Search for: "AT&T Communications" Results 2521 - 2540 of 127,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2019, 11:13 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Since no appeal is pending, the Board can only remit the case which was erroneously referred to it, to the department of first instance (following decisions T 21/02 of 20 February 2006, T 242/05 of 20 September 2006, T 1703/12 of 14 March 2013, and T 2134/12 of 16 July 2013).OrderFor these reasons it is decided that:The case is remitted to the examining division for further prosecution.This decision T 657/17(pdf) has European Case Law Identifier: … [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The return now to a request directed to use claims was motivated by the board’s critical assessment of the patent as given in the communication annexed to the summons to OPs. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:12 am by Jelle Hoekstra
The board issued a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA), annexed to a summons to oral proceedings. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:36 am by ADaigle
  The incident occured during an association meeting being held in a community church. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:37 am
"Patients aren't learning from Web sites - they're learning from each other," observes Dr. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 11:45 am by Greg Bensinger
AT&T fought for months to get its T-Mobile deal through the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:08 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
Use graphics and technology, summarize lengthy and dull evidence, don’t be afraid to joke at the right moment. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:34 am by Benjamin Wittes
I don’t want to paint with too broad a brush here and suggest that everyone who’s sympathetic to what Snowden did is really arguing for tearing down the intelligence community and operating overseas only by means of law enforcement. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The court explained that “[t]he rationale for recognizing this tripartite attorney–client relationship is that individuals with a common interest in the litigation should be able to freely communicate with their attorney, and with each other, to more effectively defend or prosecute their claims. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The court explained that “[t]he rationale for recognizing this tripartite attorney–client relationship is that individuals with a common interest in the litigation should be able to freely communicate with their attorney, and with each other, to more effectively defend or prosecute their claims. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
On February 8, 2008, an appeal was filed in the name of Zenon Environmental Inc.On March 7, 2008, the EPO sent a communication concerning the commencement of proceedings before the Board of appeal. [read post]