Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court" Results 2521 - 2540 of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lisa Stam
The tort of harassment was recognized in the 2017 Ontario Superior Court case Merrifield v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Attorney Christopher Christie told a House subcommittee on Thursday that he did nothing wrong when he steered a contract worth as much as $52 million to the firm of former Attorney General John Ashcroft. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:45 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq.
Anyway, getting back on topic, guess what, the Appellate Court Division of the Orange County Superior Court has ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:45 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez
Anyway, getting back on topic, guess what, the Appellate Court Division of the Orange County Superior Court has ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Hilary Page and Sherifa Hadi
Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205 Merrifield is another significant case because it is the first Canadian appellate court decision that has confirmed that a separate tort of harassment does not exist. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Hilary Page and Sherifa Hadi
Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205 Merrifield is another significant case because it is the first Canadian appellate court decision that has confirmed that a separate tort of harassment does not exist. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
[1]Perhaps “yes,” as hermeneutics (the rules, methods, and theories of interpreting texts) has yielded various approaches that have parallels in law.[2]Alas, almost all attorneys have ignored hermeneutics and characterized legal interpretation as sui generis. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
First, the court considered and rejected the City’s exhaustion defense against clams raised for the first time by the California Attorney General after the conclusion of the administrative proceedings, finding that the Attorney General is exempt from CEQA’s exhaustion requirements consistent with &ldq [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am by Chip Merlin
App. 2011) (‘as a general rule, contracts that are void as contrary to public policy will not be enforced by the courts and the parties will be left as the court found them’); Rogers v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
Superior Court (1996) 13 Cal.4th 893, 937), that does not extend to situations which have a substantial impact on residents’ use and enjoyment of their separate interests. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Court reversed the Kern County Superior Court’s judgment dismissing the action after that court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend based on the asserted res judicata effect on an earlier Alameda County Superior Court judgment. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:49 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 5 and Wednesday 6 July 2011 the Divisional Court will hear the application of the Attorney General to commit two newspaper groups for contempt as a result of their reporting of the Chris Jeffries case at the end of 2010. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 3:38 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Andrew Napolitano was a New Jersey Superior Court judge and hosted the daily TV talk show Freedom Watch on Fox Business News. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:40 am by Daniel Schwartz
A recent Appellate Court case, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Council 4, Local 2405 v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:48 pm
" Pursuant to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Hubbart v. [read post]