Search for: "BELL v. BELL" Results 2521 - 2540 of 5,135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
After expressly stating the test of essentiality/non-essentiality, Justice Binnie later restated his test as a test of non- essentiality as follows: It would be unfair to allow a patent monopoly to be breached with impunity by a copycat device that simply switched bells and whistles, to escape the literal claims of the patent. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:57 am
Bell Canada, [2002] and Public Service Alliance of Canada v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
The Justices have, however, permitted oral argument by an amicus that advocated an important position that a party did not, as in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications (2008). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
“The analysis appears to be very similar to the approach that was taken in [Canada (Human Rights Commission) v.] [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm by mjpetro
Bell, 762 F.2d 495, 502 (6th Cir. 1985)(refusal to place hands on car dashboard, exit from car, and place hands on roof of car). [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]