Search for: "Baker v. State"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 3,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” In the National Journal, Sam Baker looks at what might happen if the Court were to uphold the state bans on same-sex marriage and observes that such a ruling “would open up a new front in one of the most polarizing culture wars of the last 20 years. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Baker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Baker v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Baker, 295 S.W.3d 437 (Ky. 2009); Doe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
California State Lands Commission (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 549. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 6:28 am
Another case cited is Burwell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 pm
-William Brennan: He receives an extra push from me because I'm a voting rights guy, and he pretty much started the field with Baker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:28 am
That latter issue is highlighted by another 9th District, State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
These four firms are Baker Botts, Mayer Brown, Proskauer Rose and Sidley Austin. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
The Supreme Court released a major ruling this week in Ziglar v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm
In the latest development in the Trump v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
In June 2023, in 303 Creative v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm
Bobby Chesney explained a factual dispute related to the merits in Doe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
