Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 5,021
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2014, 6:53 am
In the end this is a determination by assessing the "...skill, judgment or labour" put into the creation of the work; or in other words, did the author of the work do anything more than the bare minimum in the creation of the work in question. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:52 am
In one of those cases, Dejesus v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:13 pm
The petition of the day is: Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:37 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:07 pm
[Quoting Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:07 pm
[Quoting Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 7:22 am
A divided panel of the Sixth Circuit held yesterday in Moyer v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:27 am
Last week I noted an op-ed by Professor Laurie R. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
Prince: Toward a Theory of Aesthetic-Judicial Judgments http://t.co/KDxtztqYpp -> Suit Against Google Unified Privacy Policy Barely Survives Third Motion to Dismiss http://t.co/gFxmOlS8Gk -> Movie Piracy Strikes Again http://t.co/Jz148Tja0T -> New Study: Impact of Pre-Release Piracy http://t.co/QFvoCzX7mj -> RT @mdennedy: Facebook is suddenly really interested in privacy. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
Here, employers are permitted to "go bare," meaning they can roll the dice, purchase no insurance for workplace mishaps and hope nothing bad happens. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
Manor Care Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Prince: Toward a Theory of Aesthetic-Judicial Judgments http://t.co/KDxtztqYpp -> Suit Against Google Unified Privacy Policy Barely Survives Third Motion to Dismiss http://t.co/gFxmOlS8Gk -> Movie Piracy Strikes Again http://t.co/Jz148Tja0T -> New Study: Impact of Pre-Release Piracy http://t.co/QFvoCzX7mj -> RT @mdennedy: Facebook is suddenly really interested in privacy. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The effects from the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in Burwell v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:36 am
Indiana v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Today’s case is Dimieri v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:06 pm
§ 337(a); Morris v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:57 am
Rehco, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
At a bare minimum, any such shift would need to include special rules for special-purpose corporations. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:06 pm
It gets worse… I’ll try to keep them to the bare minimum.) [read post]
