Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 4,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
Lawsuit: CrossFit later sued Alvies for trademark (and not copyright) infringement in the Northern District of California. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
Steel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Villa v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:59 pm
So far, no federal court of appeals has issued a final ruling on the issue since the Supreme Court’s decision last June, in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 9:26 am
NCDR, L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:59 am
Google could lose in Texas or win in California; so could Rockstar. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Also under Texas law, the Fifth Circuit in Pustejovsky v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless Licensing, S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Until recently, Texas common law governed misappropriation of trade secrets lawsuits in Texas. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
These include Connecticut, Georgia, Kentucky, and most recently Texas. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:57 am
See Butler v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am
LEXIS 25030 (SD TX, Feb. 27, 2014), a Texas federal magistrate judge rejected Native American inmates' challenges to the ban on inmates smoking the ceremonial pipe, infrequent Native American religious services, the grooming policy and the ban on medicine bags outside of cells.In Hodges v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Injunction against, inter alia, installing time bomb on computers , RELIABLE v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
The Future of Royalty Free http://t.co/sfryWP04gr -> Hookah Manufacturer’s Copyright Infringement Claims Go Up in Smoke: Inhale, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
The case is Lashley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
City of Farmers Branch, Texas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
California and U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
California, 13-132 and U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
