Search for: "DC Vote"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 2,705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
Today’s Washington Post web site has a story with tomorrows date, one that appears in tomorrow’s paper, about Obama’s attempts to woo the Latino vote in California. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:55 am
As I have said on these pages before, I will happily vote for Obama if he becomes the Democratic nominee, but I still see some merits in voting for Hillary Clinton. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:45 am
I remain very pessimistic about the ability of Senate Democrats to grow spines on this issue, although it is encouraging that weathervane Nelson (D-Fl.) voted for cloture on Monday, and that his DC phone people are saying he’ll vote to remove telecom immunity from the bill; this seems something of an about-face from last week’s vote to bury the Judiciary Committee version of the bill, but I’ll take what I can get. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 7:09 am
(Recall that Hillary Clinton has declared that she "believe[s] in the Second Amendment, though.)I have been more than a bit interested in trying to figure out who voted to grant cert. in this case. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 8:16 pm
WHY VOTE REPUBLICAN? [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
I've been speaking up against Ron Paul privately amongst my libertarian friends in DC, and now I'm mad at myself that I wasn't doing so more publicly before the "revelations" of the open secret. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:16 am
Circuit (Jan. 4, 2008) addressed a case in which "[a] company whose workers recently voted to unionize refuses to bargain with them, claiming that most of those who... [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 3:27 am
Yesterday I spent the day in Washington, DC with a friend who I'd last seen when I stayed with her in Kinshasa in 2006. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 2:51 pm
Here I'm referring to the K&L/Gates—Hughes & Luce merger, which by final vote of the two partnerships will go effective January 1st. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 1:55 pm
Immunity is in the bill that will eventually be voted on. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 11:23 am
If Reid had reversed the order, putting the Judiciary bill first, it could have taken 60 votes to include amnesty. [read post]
Non-Access, the SEC, and the Restrictions on Shareholder Rights: An Arbitrary Exercise of Rulemaking
14 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
It prohibits votes on access proposals that may fail or will be precatory. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
Medical Committee for Human Rights, 432 F.2d 659 (DC Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 404 U.S. 403 (1972), and abandoned one share one vote after the lone decision in Business Roundtable, 905 F.2d 406 (DC Cir. 1990). [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:30 pm
Yesterday the Washington, DC Historic Preservation Review Board (HPRB) conferred historic landmark status on DC's Third Church of Christ, Scientist, over the objections of the congregation. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
First, the vote on the SAFE Act seems unusually rushed. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:01 am
Justice Kennedy, who will likely be the swing vote, only asked a few questions, and it was difficult to read his opinion on the matter. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:40 am
And Justice Ginsburg twice suggested that the right thing to do in the case would be to reverse the DC Circuit by saying there is a constitutional right to habeas but to remand to that court for initial consideration of whether the statute provides an adequate substitute.Bottom Line: If I had to handicap the outcome, I count 4 votes to affirm on the rationale provided by the DC Circuit (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito), 3 or 4 votes to say that there is a right to… [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 3:24 am
In this post back in early September, I suggested that Justice Alito could be in play in the DC gun case (at that point just pending on cert). [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
(One might be curious as to what kinds of advice she gave Bill with regard to pushing the bill so hard and forcing House Democrats to take a predictably costly vote for no political gain--and, for that matter, no real gain in public safety, either, given the basically symbolic nature of the bill). [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
Gay marriage became a salient issue for conservatives in the 2004 election, and the gay marriage issue may have mobilized some voters to come out to the polls to vote for the Republicans, although the effect is not as great as people originally assumed. [read post]
