Search for: "David S. Kennedy"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 2,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
Here’s a detailed bio of Judy Clarke and here’s another. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
A: But what’s your definition? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
What about Oliver Wendell Holmes’s editing of Kent’s Commentaries on American Law (12th ed., 1873)? [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:06 am
His article—David Jaffe, Should I Stay or Should I Go? [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Real Estate Developer Accused of 444 Violations of Campaign Fundraising Laws MSN – Emily Alpert Reyes and David Zahniser (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 9/7/2024 The Los Angeles Ethics Commission accused real estate developer Samuel Leung of committing 444 violations of the city’s campaign finance laws, including those that prohibit the laundering of campaign money. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
David Forte, Stephen Lazarus, and Kevin O'Neill (Cleveland-Marshall), and me, supporting a motion to dismiss. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
David Singer and Frank Wayman in the third war-data handbook of the Correlates of War project, published in 2010. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:13 am
Chesebro describes in detail the Hawaii 1960 case in Kennedy-Nixon, in which democrats met to issue a declaration during the state’s recount (which Kennedy ultimately won). [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Deneen’s Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future (2023), Yoram Hazony’s Conservatism: A Rediscovery (2022), and Adrian Vermeule’s Common Good Constitutionalism: Recovering the Classical Legal Tradition (2022). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The plurality opinion, joined by Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter, reaffirmed what they called Roe's "essential holdings": that women are entitled to get abortions before the viability threshold; that states may prevent post-viability abortions not necessary to protect the life or health of the mother; and that states may institute pre-viability maternal health regulations. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The plurality opinion, joined by Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter, reaffirmed what they called Roe's "essential holdings": that women are entitled to get abortions before the viability threshold; that states may prevent post-viability abortions not necessary to protect the life or health of the mother; and that states may institute pre-viability maternal health regulations. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
Kennedy’s administration, and the disastrous consequences of those policies in Vietnam. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Pam Brandwein and Jack Balkin have offered excellent summaries of Lessig’s basic argument in their postings in this symposium. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:35 pm
Kennedy issued his decision Aug. 7, 2006. *** Pennant Foods Co., a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of CS Bakery Holdings, Inc., a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Chef Solutions Holdings, LLC (34-CA-11385, et al., and 34-RC-1925; 352 NLRB No. 62) North Haven, CT May 12, 2008. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:00 am
Bloomberg, Governor David A. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm
David Price, D-N.C., Ken Calvert, R-Calif., and David Obey, D-Wis., and Sen. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
And this understanding of the Constitution's text is the only view consistent with Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
But simply allowing those claims to be adjudicated on the merits in Federal court will go a long way to preserve the legitimacy in criminal justice in a case in which a man's life is at stake.Then I was going to quote a brief exchange between Justices Ginsburg and Kennedy and John Neiman, Jr., Alabama's Solicitor General.JUSTICE GINSBURG: Did you oppose it? [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Writing for the Court, Justice David Souter stated that “the question is, does a state-law claim necessarily raise a stated federal issue, actually disputed and substantial, which a federal forum may entertain without disturbing any congressionally approved balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities[?] [read post]
