Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 2521 - 2540 of 4,619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2014, 11:22 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The OFCCP’s proposal would revise its regulations at 41 CFR Part 60-1, which set forth the reporting obligations of covered federal contractors and subcontractors under Executive Order (EO) 11246. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
The latter covers, among other things, some products and services of the same classes, ie 9, 28, and 41. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 8:29 am by The Rotolo Law Firm
The “AARP Bulletin” cited data showing that after divorce the average income for a man drops about 23% and for a woman by about 41%. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:14 am
I see that Bush's "41" is #2. #1 is a children's book, as is much of the top-selling reading material. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
Note, for example pages 29-35, 41-43 and 77-82. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:57 pm by Eliana Baer
The husband was sixty-four years old when he retired on April 1, 2010 and he began receiving pension benefits on May 1, 2010, triggering the wife’s right to receive her share of the PERS pension benefit, per the parties’ PSA. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
That these are determinative factors for the purposes of Articles 4(1) and 4(2) does not exclude them from consideration under 4(3). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:04 pm by Tanya Forsheit
  However, the report points out that a large portion of this increase is due to two massive retailer breaches, including the Target breach – which by itself affected 41 million customers, including 7.5 million Californians. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Chapter Readings·      United Nations Rule of Law, “What is the Rule of Law”[1]·      Norhiro Urabe, “Rule of Law and Due Process: A Comparative View of the United States and Japan,”[2]Law and Contemporary Problems 53(1):61-72 (1990)·      David Clark, “The Many Meanings of the Rule of Law”·      Hamdi v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm by Jodie Liu
Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965), and Haig v. [read post]