Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 2,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, The Next Battle: Transparency (July 1, 2004)5. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 10:42 am
Thus, to get taxpayers to fund Proposition 71, one Stanford professor says "royalties" and when the taxpayers seek to collect after Proposition 71 is passed a different Stanford professor says "no royalties" [and does NOT mention the first Stanford professor.]Although Noll did not mention the substantive difficulties presented by the Hwang fraud, Noll did mention patents:The purposes for enacting state-sponsored hESC research programs are diverse. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 1:45 pm
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
This does not mean, however, that a variance sentence is presumptively unreasonable. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 2:20 am
Under new rules if the person on behalf of whom the prosecutor has filed a claim does not sustain the claim the court closes judicial procedures only in case if the claimant's refusal to sustain the claim does not breach any provisions of law and does not affect any third persons' rights and legitimate interests. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Cullen issued his decision June 16, 2006. *** Avante at Wilson, Inc. (11-RC-6495, 6496; 348 NLRB No. 71) Wilson, NC Oct. 31, 2006. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 9:57 am
And to top it off, Carhart also does quite a bit of Longstreet bashing (and I'm a Longstreet man). [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
§ 7-1-104.) [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 4:17 pm
Partners are not the only ones being queried: Camerons does the same in face-to-face interviews with some 150 clients annually, although there of course the questions are more along the lines of meeting service expectations—and even asking for numerical grades on a score of 1-5. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 5:40 am
(p. 71). 8. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 3:51 am
Deschutes County DA Mike Dugan says his colleagues are overreacting and says AIP does more good than harm. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
Buschmann issued his decision April 4, 2006. *** C&K Insulation, Inc. (3-CA-24151; 347 NLRB No. 71) Binghamton, NY July 31, 2006. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
& Pol'y 1-4 (2005). [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
§24-2-1; Adams v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:14 pm
‘Pashukanis and Vyshinsky a Study in the Development of Marxian Legal Theory'[1]). [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Doe, 125 S.Ct. 1230 (2005), and the discussion of the two cases in El-Masri v. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
Cir. 2005)), and PATENTS.COM (In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 71 USPQ2d 1370 (Fed. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
The government does not know when a debtor's rights are being violated. [read post]
12 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
" However, the CAFC shot down that approach last year in In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 71 USPQ2d 1370 (Fed. [read post]
