Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 2521 - 2540 of 57,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
., decided last Thursday, the Federal Circuit affirmed a determination by the District Court for the District of New Jersey that Matrix Laboratories, Ltd., Mylan Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc., and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:40 am
Treasury Department's commitment of federal dollars to American International Group, Inc., whose subsidiaries market and sell Sharia-compliant financing products: You can access today's ruling of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:21 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Essex issued Order No. 12 denying Complainant ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies’ (“ChriMar”) motion to strike non-party Google Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:06 am by Bruce Nye
Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc., 184 F.3d 527, 533 (6th Cir. 1999) (each defendant gets 30 days from when it was served). [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:23 pm by Tom Fisher
On May 26, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Deere & Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm by Donna Sokol
., Inc. has generously allowed the Law Library of Congress to offer free online access to historical U.S. legal materials from HeinOnline. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:42 pm
The federal government recalled 2 million drop-side baby cribs on Thursday because of a potential death hazard. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:16 am
The Federal Circuit today decried the difficulty of steering a true path between the Scylla and Charybdis of patent law -- infringement and validity. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Last fall, the Federal Circuit decided in Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:15 am by Robert Levy
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the Federal Circuit”) issued its opinion in Solutran, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:52 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The U.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) issued its Opinion in the case of Curver Luxembourg, SARL (“Curver”) versus Home Expressions Inc., (“Home Expressions”) to construe claim language of a design patent to limit the scope of the claimed design. [read post]