Search for: "French v. French" Results 2521 - 2540 of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
Other courts, such as the French Cour de cassation ignored Réunion completely (Société Kalenborn Kalprotect v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
This appeal engaged the unique question of the scope of government’s discretion regarding admission to the French first language school in Hay River, École Boréale, and the constitutionality of a Ministerial Directive … Association des parents ayants droit de Yellowknife et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Google’s First Amendment claim has a straightforward component based on a 1999 case, Ford v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
Here's my checklist|Fujifilm v AbbVie: practice, procedure and policy analysis|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 2 - SOULUXE - likelihood of confusion|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 1 - IWATCH, descriptive goods and acquired distinctivenessNever Too Late 143 [week ending on Sunday 9 April]French court rules that resale right royalty must be only paid by sellers I Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme… [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Surging levels of violence meant that he escaped Sri Lanka on a French passport and arrived in the UK to claim asylum where his two brothers and uncle lived. [read post]
17 May 2021, 5:33 am by Rose Hughes
The Irish Court of Appeal decision on this point was in line with the Paris Court of Appeal decision on the French Inegy SPC application (as reported by the SPC blog). [read post]
7 May 2017, 5:53 pm
Further, the decision threatens to undercut precedent from key FRAND licensing court decisions, such as the CJEU's Huawei v ZTE C-170/13 or the UK's Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:20 pm
A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in the High Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
In one of these cases, Case T-342/12, Max Fuchs v OHIM, Les Complices, decided back in October, the General Court was faced with an opposition by Les Complices, the owner of CTM and French registrations for the five-pointed star on the left, maintaining that there was a likelihood of it being confused with the CTM applicant's five-pointed star on the right in respect of bags and clothing. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:16 am by Larry
Remember my post on U.S. v. [read post]