Search for: "Heard v. State"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 17,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
Stage 5: The Supreme Court On 14 and 15 October 2015, the Supreme Court heard an appeal from the CMA. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am
This week, the state supreme court heard oral arguments on the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:51 am
On June 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Steve Granger, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
On March 11, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Carlos Sivit, et al., v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
" Chacon v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:01 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:17 pm
Nothing a state legislature does under the authority of Moore v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:44 pm
Kyrillos Vote Against LaVecchia Justified State Senator Joe Kyrillos (R- Monmouth/Middlesex) issued the following statement denouncing the State Supreme Court’s decision in the latest round of Abbott v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:35 am
On Wednesday the Court heard oral argument in CSX Transportation v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Florida, one of two cases to be heard by the Supreme Court on Monday, March 1. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:44 pm
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday for the second time in Florida v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Apple--will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday, October 21, 2022. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Bruch v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:40 pm
This was in fact stated by the tribunal Burlington v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
The Court heard oral argument yesterday in Hertz Corporation v. [read post]