Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 2521 - 2540 of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:57 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Scalia with opinion in Argentina v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:21 am by Florian Mueller
It's one of the Solicitor General's tasks to represent the United States in court. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  Shapiro happens to be a Russian-born, Canadian-naturalized lawful permanent resident (green-card holder) of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 12:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
Ultimately, the patent holder is attempting to regulate activity outside of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Sam Bray
The immigration-uniformity argument appeared in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm by Bexis
  Both Linda Maichl, at Ulmer & Berne, who represents generic drug manufacturers, and Justinian Lane, who hosts a plaintiff-side blog, sent us copies of the Solicitor General’s brief for the United States as amicus curiae in the Supreme Court Pliva/Mensing case. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The ADRs are registered in the United States with the SEC, but Tesco is not required to and does not file annual or periodic reports with the SEC. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:26 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, famous in patent circles for his antisuit injunction and FRAND determination in the Microsoft v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]