Search for: "J" Results 2521 - 2540 of 110,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
The decision deals with an appeal filed against the decision of the Receiving Section that a divisional would not be treated as such because the parent application was not pending any more.Here is a simplified (!) [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:48 am
This decision on a request for reestablishment is interesting above all because of the unusual auxiliary requests:The appellant requests:(1) Reestablishment and immediate examination of the application;(2) Replacement of claim 1 by claim 1C(3) Reimbursement of all costs that have arisen to the appellant (Appeal fee, annuities as from the third year and compensation amounts as well as training lessons in technical mechanics and EP patent rules) by the first examiner;(4) Replacement of the first… [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Brian Leiter
A well-known scholar in the labor and employment law fields, he was, at the time of his death, a professor of law at Loyola University,... [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
This decision deals with the rejection of an application by the Receiving Section (RS). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 12:14 pm
 The Metnews reports Court of Appeal Justice Victoria Chaney to RetireCourt of Appeal Justice Justice Victoria Chaney, 78, announced yesterday that she will be leaving the bench next month.She said in an email addressed to “Dear Friends and Colleagues”: “Over these past fifteen years, I have had the honor to have worked with each of you on fascinating and important cases that have affected many people’s lives. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:14 pm by Mandour & Associates
To continue reading, click: J&J Birth Control Patent Upheld In Infringement Suit V. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:37 pm by Buce
And you thought all the trouble was in the Humanities Departments:We do not need to write jV (GH)j and jE(GH)j separately, since jV(GH)j = jV (G)j and jV (GH)j = jE(GH)j + 1 by construction. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): DCT Order Granting EXC Motion for Summary J Jensen Motion for Summary J EXC Motion for Summary J Navajo Court Defendants Brief Jensen Response EXC Response Jensen Reply EXC Reply Tribal court materials are here. [read post]
Meanwhile, the new J&J took on virtually all of the old J&J’s productive business assets. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:16 pm
Caberá ao contribuinte concordar ou discordar do imposto já calculado. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 3:59 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
J&J Trial Verdicts J&J lost an $8.3 million verdict in the first trial over the hip device and won the second. [read post]