Search for: "Jacob Rule"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 3,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 1:37 pm
These economic conditions bespeak disinvestment – if prices are falling, people are leaving, or crime is becoming a threat (through lack of Jane Jacobs’ “eyes on the street“), then physical decay cannot be far if at all behind. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 1:48 pm
The targeted of the information released, Jacob Putman had complained on the campaign trail of, "A good old boys club in Smith County for whom it matters more about who you know than what you did. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
This position generated controversy among court observers and frustration from victims; see these posts from Kevin Jon Heller and Dov Jacobs, and from Katherine Gallagher and Nikki Reisch, who represent victims. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court ruling that found lawmakers previously drew districts that unlawfully dilute the political power of its Black residents in violation of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:39 pm
Hawkes)House Bill 96 is another "clean up" bill proposed by the state engineer that would amend the water forfeiture statute, Utah Code section 73-1-4, to: (1) require that a lease be in writing and have an specific termination date before it qualifies as an exception to the forfeiture provisions; (2) limit the time to seven years that an exception to the forfeiture provisions apply where use of a reservoir is limited due to safety, regulatory, or engineering restrictions; (3) allow the… [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
These rules capture and prohibit a considerable amount of objectionable conduct, including communications that are both useless and inflammatory. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Minority—the MQD as a “weak” clear statement rule. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 7:28 am
Companies can be fined anywhere from 10,000 yuan to 100,000 yuan (between about $1,570 and $15,740) for violations of the rules. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 11:21 am
This set of rules comes on the heels of China’s Data Security Law, which promised additional oversight of data sharing and hefty punishments for those who breached cross-border data transfer rules. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
” But this is only law in the Ninth Circuit, which based its ruling on fraud-prevention grounds. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
Intent ruled out. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
The district court granted LabCorp's motion to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony based on its conclusion that her methodology did not meet the reliability requirements under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Hard to get a narrow rule out of that. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
’ When the relationship with Kays began, A.J. was dating Jacob, a boy she had been seeing off and on for two years; Kays was jealous of Jacob.Kays testified he may have been in the throes of depression or a midlife crisis when his relationship with A.J. began. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) to take final action under section 110(k) of the CAA on the “Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Rule 420” (Imperial Rule 420), a State implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of California to EPA on or about August 24, 2007, which pertains to measures to control particulate matter emissions from beef feedlot operations within the Imperial Valley. [read post]
28 May 2021, 4:00 am
That Might Break the Rules. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Rules only require third parties to log their efforts in the public register, while in-house lobbyists do not have to. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
The ruling will determine whether and how quickly Trump faces trial. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
“Evidence of fraud undetectable by the foreign court” and the mention of “new and material facts” in [Jacobs v. [read post]
