Search for: "John Doe 2 " Results 2521 - 2540 of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by Lisa Baird
This post was written by Nan Bonifant, Brad Rostolsky, and John Wyand On February 6, 2014, the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:38 am
" In sum, the marks are dissimilar as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.Petitioner argued that its NAUTICA marks are famous, but the Board observed that even it assumed fame for Section 2(d) purposes, that does not prove likelihood of confusion. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 3:12 am
Moon's plight is mentioned at the end of the Wall Street Journal article.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:26 am
Please share this post with your friends - for free.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:26 am by John L. Welch
The Board was unimpressed by these assertions: it refused to take judicial notice of any facts purportedly underlying these accusations, found no supporting evidence in the record, and saw no egregious conduct in opposer's conduct of the opposition.And so the Board sustained the opposition on the Section 2(d) ground, declining to reach opposer's dilution claim.Read comments and post your comments here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:13 am by David Friedman
Back of the Envelope Thoughts on Teaching: 2 Thoughts on Teaching: 1 The Abuse of Statistics John Marshall has made his decision Slander Why I Believe Things Who to Trust Recognizing Theories Tribal Loyalty Not What We Intended A Positive Account of Rights Recipes Fictional Saints Libertarian Arguments for Income Redistribution Ignorance of Politicians Race, Gender and IQ I Have Seen the Past — and It Works Bad for Us, Bad for You, Bad More on Politics Political Thoughts… [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
"Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: I guess life's not so good for LG at the TTAB.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 3:14 am
The fact that the cited registration issued under Section 2(f) does not mean that the the registered mark is not entitled to protection against registration of a "highly-similar mark for closely-related services. [read post]