Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 3,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
See Kashelkar v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:33 pm
ABC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:36 am
And while Ian's proposal (a supermajority vote for non-retention) is an interesting one, it is susceptible to the argument levied against Article V--it makes popular constitutional change not only difficult, but virtually impossible. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 9:10 am
Paul Levy has an excellent and lengthy writeup about this case, the Blockowicz case and their implications. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:49 am
By Eric Goldman After some prodding by Paul Levy of Public Citizen, Google has filed an unredacted version of its response brief in the Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 8:55 pm
Finally, part V explains why, in light of the foregoing, levying these sanctions was improper. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:17 pm
Burns v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
* I'm helping Paul Levy and Public Citizen try to unseal the "confidential" joint appendix in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Qualifying for reinstatementLevy v Freeport UFSD, 275 A.D.2d 459, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 N.Y.2d 769Carol L. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Many papers on legal communication were presented at NCA 10: The 96th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, held November 14-17, 2010 in San Francisco, California, USA. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
The complaint (full text) in First Baptist Church of Mission v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds HALLUX descriptive for… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:59 pm
by Paul Alan Levy For more than three decades, the courts have recognized a general policy under both the common law and the First Amendment under which judicial records — both briefs that argue how judges should resolve cases, and the evidence submitted in support of those arguments — should be open to the public unless there are very good reasons why particular pieces of evidence should be kept secret. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
In Chan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:19 am
Lee Pruett In State Farm v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:19 pm
Hoffman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:52 am
” “If allowed to stand as a tax, the Minimum Essential Coverage provision would be the only tax in U.S. history to be levied directly on individuals for their failure to affirmitively engage in activity mandated by the government not specifically delineated in the Constitution. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Highlights this week included: US: Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v Crippen (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (1709 Blog) CAFC: Section 101 and process claims: Research Corp. v. [read post]
