Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 15,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 2:41 pm
The facts of State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:25 am
" Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 12:31 am
In that case, the law firm of Bardehle Pagenberg was on the defending side. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
The past year has been a busy one for Canadian competition law. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
.* Cross-Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property: at last, the book reviewEarlier this month, Jeremy posted an announcement concerning the publication of The Research Handbook on Cross-Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property. [read post]
Last Week at the 6th Circuit: Substantive unreasonableness, maiden voyages, and railroaded state law
21 May 2019, 11:03 am
in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:04 am
In the case of Risko v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm
" Texas claims illegal migration and cross‐border drug smuggling qualify as "invasion," thereby authorizing it to install the buoys even if doing so would otherwise be barred by a federal law. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:44 pm
In today’s case, Thauili v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Benjamin Curtis – in his capacity as an attorney in Boston – argued in the 1836 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
In many cases people do this without really understanding the consequences of what they are doing.The problems of using joint tenancies with children are again illustrated in a recent British Columbia case, Turner v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
Its purpose is to inform rather than to advocate.The following are among the cases reviewed in the Survey: A California Supreme Court decision involving recordings of cross border communications and another California case raising issues of cross-border discrimination in managing a web site; a product-liability decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court backtracking from its earlier pro-plaintiff decisions, and several other cases continuing to apply the pro-defendant law of… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm
Update: the Supreme Court is considering the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
” See US v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:32 am
This is “differentiation v integration”. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 11:21 am
Where these three criteria are met, the cross-border personal data transfer must comply with Chapter V, meaning the transfer must be based on one of the Chapter V transfer tools, such as an adequacy decision or standard contractual clauses, even when the importer is subject to the GDPR with respect to the processing in question. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 11:21 am
Where these three criteria are met, the cross-border personal data transfer must comply with Chapter V, meaning the transfer must be based on one of the Chapter V transfer tools, such as an adequacy decision or standard contractual clauses, even when the importer is subject to the GDPR with respect to the processing in question. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court in Berghuis v. [read post]
