Search for: "Levi v Levi"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 3,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2010, 8:55 pm
Finally, part V explains why, in light of the foregoing, levying these sanctions was improper. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:17 pm
Burns v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
* I'm helping Paul Levy and Public Citizen try to unseal the "confidential" joint appendix in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Qualifying for reinstatementLevy v Freeport UFSD, 275 A.D.2d 459, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 N.Y.2d 769Carol L. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Many papers on legal communication were presented at NCA 10: The 96th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, held November 14-17, 2010 in San Francisco, California, USA. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
The complaint (full text) in First Baptist Church of Mission v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds HALLUX descriptive for… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:59 pm
by Paul Alan Levy For more than three decades, the courts have recognized a general policy under both the common law and the First Amendment under which judicial records — both briefs that argue how judges should resolve cases, and the evidence submitted in support of those arguments — should be open to the public unless there are very good reasons why particular pieces of evidence should be kept secret. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
In Chan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:19 am
Lee Pruett In State Farm v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:19 pm
Hoffman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:52 am
” “If allowed to stand as a tax, the Minimum Essential Coverage provision would be the only tax in U.S. history to be levied directly on individuals for their failure to affirmitively engage in activity mandated by the government not specifically delineated in the Constitution. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Highlights this week included: US: Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v Crippen (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (1709 Blog) CAFC: Section 101 and process claims: Research Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:54 am
Will this Directive address only management issues such as transparency, or will it touch on sensitive substantive issues such as private copying and the collection of levies for it? [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
The Competition Commission of India has issued its order in Case No. 5/2009 (decision dated 2nd December 2010), Neeraj Malhotra v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:07 am
I believe Paul Levy will be working to get those redactions revealed. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:51 am
The message may sound paradoxical, but "Copyright owners better off in a regime that allows downloading from illegal sources" was the striking title of a recent post on The 1709 Blog which reported on the 15 November ruling of the Court of Appeal of the Hague in Eyeworks v FTD. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
For an elaborate account of the law, interested readers may refer to Chitty on Contracts (30th edition, ¶ 26-010 onwards), McGregor on Damages (18th edition, Chapter 13), and the leading decisions in Astley v Weldon, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v New Garage (especially Lord Dunedin) and Phillips v AG of Hong Kong, (1993) 61 BLR 41. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
See Graham v. [read post]
