Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 2521 - 2540 of 3,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
The insurer indicated that the homeowner could remove the bricks and thus the evidence central to the case was destroyed, and the plaintiff's premises liability claim was impeded. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:28 am by Erin Kristofco
The Court stated, We also conclude that defendant reads too much into the meaning of “fairly debatable” by suggesting that an insurer can avoid liability for unjustified denials of benefits simply by framing each denial as a valuation dispute. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Precollegiate football is already sustaining 90,000 or more concussions each year. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:28 pm by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Farmers Insurance, 115 Cal.App.4th 715 (2004) (Bell III), where this same court had approved the use of statistical sampling to determine classwide damages. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:10 am by A. Lahser, Trademark Attorney
If the insurance company will defend you, so much the better.Good luck dealing with your demand letter.Related PostsTrademark Common Law: Can I use another business’s name? [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 6:16 pm by Ilya Somin
The most plausible route to the death of football starts with liability suits. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:21 pm by CAPTAIN
Those companies include:Progressive - 7 cases; State Farm - 11 cases; Allstate - 6 cases; Kingsway Amigo - 4 cases; GEICO - 3 cases; and Responsive, Safeco, and Infinity, with one case each where they appear as a named defendant in these PIP suits. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:59 am by Brian A. Comer
  In a case with multiple defendants, a punitive damages award must be specific to each defendant, and the defendant is only liable for that amount. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Victoria VanBuren
 Medical Liability Procedural Reform Act of 2011. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:46 pm
The result: No noticeable effect on doctor liability insurance premiums. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:51 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As the Court explained, “fundamentally, the issue here is not just that USB was prevented from defending each individual claim but also that USB was unfairly restricted in presenting its defense to class-wide liability. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:45 am by admin
The result: No noticeable effect on doctor liability insurance premiums. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
In each of these instances the camera is not placed by a party to a lawsuit but by a third party for premise liability purposes. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
Defendant's Act or Control An even more fundamental policy lies at the heart of this opinion: Liability is not imposed for an injury unless it was caused “by an act or instrumentality under defendant’s control. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
Defendant's Act or Control An even more fundamental policy lies at the heart of this opinion: Liability is not imposed for an injury unless it was caused “by an act or instrumentality under defendant’s control. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:57 am by David Navetta
The reality then (as now) is that companies suffer security breaches each and every day. [read post]