Search for: "O’Connor Law"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 3,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2022, 6:28 am
” Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor responded to Judge Friot’s ruling by seeking execution dates over the next two years for 25 of the 28 who challenged the use of midazolam in Friot’s Court. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:19 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, Kennedy, O’Neill, DeWine and Fischer No: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice O’Donnell Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2151.352 (Right to Counsel in Certain Juvenile Court Proceedings) A child, the child’s parents or custodian, or any other person in loco parentis of the child is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of the… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am
As Kennedy also wrote in Bond, quoting Justice O’Connor in the earlier case Gregory v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:47 am
That case was not only decided by a five-to-four vote, but one of the five Justices — Justice Sandra Day O’Connor — repeatedly announced after her retirement that she regretted her vote. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
Arizona (2002), in which the Court extended Apprendi to the finding of aggravating factors for imposing the death penalty, Justice O’Connor wrote in dissent that Apprendi “directly contradicts” Almendarez-Torres (although she viewed that statement as a criticism of Apprendi). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 8:13 am
Of course the justices never said anything about the hearings or the nominee; even Justice O’Connor, who often rode to work with me because we lived near one another, was mum on the topic. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:13 am
As reported by News4SanAntonio.com, “[t]he shooting took place just before 10:30 a.m. at an apartment complex on the 13600 block of O’Connor Road near Nacogdoches. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:39 pm
Rather, he claimed that such preferences were lawful only if used to promote “diversity” among the student body, a rationale reiterated by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor for a five-to-four majority in the 2003 Grutter case.... [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
O’Connor of Honolulu-based law firm of Ogawa, Lau, Nakamura & Jew. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Not only is Justice Brennan’s court gone, so is the center-right O’Connor/Kennedy Court. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
” Votes to Accept the Case** Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor,*Justices Kennedy, Stewart, French, Donnelly and former Justice DeGenaro* *Chief Justice O’Connor and former Justice DeGenaro would also accept the case on proposition of law No. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
From the Court that denied cert. in Brazauskas to the one that granted cert. in Hosanna, Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Stevens, O’Connor [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
Justice DeWine wrote the lead opinion, joined by Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice French. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
Hopkins, the employer claimed that it did not discriminate against women as a class, but the court (a plurality of four plus the reasoning of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s concurring opinion) ruled that failing to promote a woman who did not fit the employer’s stereotype of “feminine” behavior would violate Title VII. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices O’Donnell and Lanzinger agreed with the opinion in full, with Justice Lanzinger adding a short separate concurrence. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm
Keppler is a partner at Pierro, Connor & Strauss. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:50 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor; Justices Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and O’Neill. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Rabiej Leaves The Sedona Conference for Duke Law Center - bit.ly/xOirdg (Brendan McKenna) Keeping Your Outsourced Solution From Becoming A Problem - bit.ly/A61j6J (Joey Seeber, Shaun Yeh) Making The Most Of Delaware’s New eDiscovery Rules: Tips 1-5 - bit.ly/zQXx9T (Daniel Garrie) More Legal Issues about Privacy (and GPS) - bit.ly/xb9Apl (Peter Vogel) NY State Court adopts Zubulake Standard: Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:02 am
” The three dissenting Justices (Stevens, Blackmun, and O’Connor) were particularly incredulous of the majority’s assertion that Jairo had failed to provide any evidence of that the guerrillas had a political motive: It follows as night follows day that the guerrillas’ implied threat to “take” him or to “kill” [Jairo]if he did not change his position constituted threatened persecution “on account… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
Rumsfeld (2004), Justice Sandra Day O’Connor noted that Hamdi was arguing that he potentially faced “the substantial prospect of perpetual detention. [read post]
