Search for: "People v Then"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 72,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2011, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
Similarly, in People v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
In Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:46 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
As the Court held in People v Lyon, AD3d, 2010 NY Slip Op 06892 [10/01/10], where "a defendant's testimony conflicts with evidence precluded by a Sandoval ruling, "the defense opens the door' on the issue in question, and the [defendant] is properly subject to impeachment by the prosecution's use of the otherwise precluded evidence" (People v Fardan, 82 NY2d 638, 646; see People v Rodriguez, 85 NY2d 586, 591). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:08 am
The United States Supreme Court recently handed down its decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Many people have assumed that the Supreme Court’s decision to grant cert. in King v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:25 am
It begins: In Fischer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:12 pm
Murray and Shaw NYT Oped: In Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:11 am
I'll tell people the Ninth Circuit wants their input. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
In King v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:55 am
” The line between fact and fiction may not always be so clear, however, as Maryland’s Court of Special Appeals discovered in addressing the issues raised in Publish America, LLP v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898,… [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Today's IRAP v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
Lehmann describes the dubious reasoning behind the court’s 1886 fiat, in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 3:35 am
Zuckerberg has described a metaverse where people can be fitted with full-body suits that let them feel even more sensations, which she said was troubling. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
There is also another dimension that might be labeled "libertarian" v. [read post]
