Search for: "People v. Photo" Results 2521 - 2540 of 3,816
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
  That said, it is not inherently unethical to give people uncertain information — even when the information is potentially devastating and even if it’s not “clinically actionable. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Railroad Friction Products Corp., Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, October 12, 2012 Photo credit: Larry D. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:17 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
I-Flow, LLC, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, October 22, 2012 Photo credit: By SynCardia Systems, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:57 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a case, The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:25 am
 Both Kats wish that people would stop writing about "naked photos" or "half-naked photos": it's the people who are wholly or partly starkers -- not the photos. [read post]