Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 4,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2018, 4:37 am
Our decisions in Long v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 5:32 pm
* People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
The new election law case, Harris v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Enemy of the People: what price water information – David Hart QC, UK Human Rights Blog – Discussed the decision of the Tribunal in Smartsource v Information Commissioner [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23 November 2010 as to whether information about water and wastewater billing etc was environmental information which involved determining whether water companies and sewage undertakers were “public authorities” for the purposes of the EIR. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
California v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
Sure, you can go to the state exchanges and pay the full, unsubsidized price, which very few people pay (minimum income, ballpark, $100k+, and as mentioned above, the vast majority of people earning that kind of money have employer-based insurance anyway). [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:54 pm
(Pix Credit HERE)Guiding cases have been issued by the Chinese Supreme People's COurt since 2011. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
In those two cases, none of the patent-holders contributed anything to the economic development of the highly profitable products that were created by thousands of other people and the amount of money demanded as damages in those two cases bore no reasonable relationship to the inventor's alleged contribution to those products.The Eolas and Blackberry cases are prime evidence of patent law run wild - a development which has not escaped the notice of the US Supreme Court, whose decision… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
Copyright owners try to engage in price discrimination by carving up the world into geographic territories with different prices for the same product. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
The police and community groups say they’re focusing areas where people are not following government social distancing recommendations. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:47 am
My response invoked Cincinnati v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:55 am
by Kieran McCarthy [Eric’s note: this is the second of a two-part series on the denouement of the hiQ v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:04 pm
[See Hughes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Mink v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:02 pm
Do you have one of those menus without any prices? [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:36 pm
In Miranda v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 2:03 pm
A disparate treatment claim says that the defendant treats disabled people differently that non-disabled people. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]