Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 2521 - 2540 of 27,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
Friday may not be the end of the week for most people, but it marks the end of the working week for most IP practitioners and their clients, as well as the many administrators, policy-makers and 24/7 devotees of the subject. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The real issue is whether the Eighth Amendment makes it illegal to punish homeless people for public encampments.The case is City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:49 pm by Mukund Rathi
They are also expanding both qualified immunity, which often protects both state and federal officials from paying damages, as well as flawed doctrine from Monell v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 am
  They have become an important part of the juridical contribution to the cage of regulation that is Chinese Socialist legality in the 21st century.Though unusual, on 23 May 2022 the Supreme People's Court issued a bilingual Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Strengthening Blockchain Application in the Judicial Field (Full text in English and… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
I even got comments from people that thought I was "absurd" for not listing them. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Note also that publicly urging people to fire someone for his speech, even when the firing would be illegal, is likely constitutionally protected under Brandenburg v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by Rick Garnett
How well do this argument and this principle cohere with the relevant text, history, traditions, and values? [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:12 am by Mark Zamora
That lawyer then sued more than 65 people/lawyers/businesses for among other things, defamation. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am by Eric Goldman
The magistrate rejects Craigslist’s argument that its “conduct consisted of providing a neutral platform for people to post and search content on the internet. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nothing in the statute restricts its application solely to harmful conduct directed at children (see, People v Bergerson, 17 [95 N.Y.2d 372] NY2d 398, 401 [noting that the prior version of statute was intended to be broad in scope]). [read post]