Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 123,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 9:33 am
Ewing v Director of Public Prosecutions; [2008] WLR (D) 276; [2008] WLR (D) 276 “It was necessary for a person who was the subject of a civil proceedings order to seek leave, under s 42(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, to make an application for permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review notwithstanding that the underlying decision he sought to challenge related to a criminal cause or matter. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:29 am
Jennings v Crown Prosecution Service [2008] UKHL 29; [2008] WLR (D) 153 “Orders for the confiscation criminal assets, or orders restraining the disposal of property pending the hearing of a confiscation order, were to be made in respect of property which the person had actually obtained, not property he had merely helped others to obtain. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:10 am
Preparation of heroin syringe does not constitute manslaughter Regina v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
Regina v Xu and Others Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Persons convicted of being concerned in the large scale commercial cultivation or production of cannabis, could expect to receive sentences with a starting point of three years if they acted as a gardener, six to seven years if they acted as an organiser, three to seven years if they acted as a manager and higher sentences where they controlled a large number of such operations. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Regina v George and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148; [2010] WLR (D) 147 “Where a statute imposed criminal liability on an individual who dishonestly agreed with one or more other people to do a prohibited act, the intention and purpose was to criminalise that individual, regardless of whether those other persons were also dishonest. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:22 am
Caudle v LD Law Ltd [2008] EWHC 374 (QB); WLR (D) 78 “A person who intends to exercise his entitlement to apply for a grant of letters of administration of an estate does not have an enforceable right to immediate possession of property formerly owned by the deceased unless it is necessary that he takes possession to safeguard the estate. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:56 am
In Carpenters Combined Funds v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:51 am
Such will continue to be the case with Huber v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:01 am
Such is the case in Connelly v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Such persons may be actual witnesses to an event in dispute, or they may have knowledge that is based on heresay See Smith v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Such persons may be actual witnesses to an event in dispute, or they may have knowledge that is based on heresay See Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
In Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
In Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:08 am
In Fortunato v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:54 pm
Vis v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:06 am
Roult (by his mother and litigation friend) v North West Strategic Health Authority [2009] EWCA Civ 444; [2009] WLR (D) 164 “There was no power pursuant to CPR r 3.1 in the context of personal injury litigation to vary the terms of a settlement where there had been an unforseen event which destroyed the assumption on [...] [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 2:39 am
Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd, Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening House of Lords “In determining whether a person was disabled within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act 1975 by reason of having an impairment which, although capable of being controlled by measures taken to treat it, would be likely to have substantial adverse effects but [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:18 am
Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] WLR (D) 64 “In all cases where a local authority was seeking possession of a property which constituted a persons home, including persons who had been granted introductory tenancies pursuant to Part V of the Housing Act 1996 and persons who had been granted a licence of property under the homelessness regime… [read post]
