Search for: "Richard v. Richard" Results 2521 - 2540 of 12,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm by carie
Case 2:04-cv-01156- GLF-MRA Document 594 Filed 10/23/09 Page 1 of 4UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RICHARD COOEY, et al., Plaintiffs Case No. 2:04-cv-1156 JUDGE GREGORY FROST v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:22 pm by Paul Horwitz
In the nineteenth century, many common or public schools, believing that religious and moral education was important but facing doctrinal disagreements within the broad Protestant majority, adopted a practice that John Jeffries and James Ryan call a "least-common-denominator Protestantism" that avoided areas of controversy. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:17 pm by Richard Samp
Richard Samp is chief counsel of the Washington Legal Foundation, which filed an amicus brief in support of the employers in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
Disciplinary charges allege use of inappropriate languageBernstein v Norwich City School District, 282 A.D.2d 70, leave to appeal denied, 96 N.Y.2d 937In May 1998 Richard C. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:05 pm by Rumpole
The title of the post links to a fascinating decision in State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:37 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Justice Richard BernsteinYesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court, in one of Justice Richard Bernstein's first opinions, held that when a husband-wife medical marijuana operation is not conducted in strict accord with the Medical Marijuana Act, the wife, whose role was limited to assisting with the harvest schedule, is not afforded immunity under the MMA. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
McMahonDale Carpenter, FLAGRANT CONDUCT: THE STORY OF LAWRENCE V. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:47 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Justice Richard BernsteinYesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court, in one of Justice Richard Bernstein's first opinions, held that when a husband-wife medical marijuana operation is not conducted in strict accord with the Medical Marijuana Act, the wife, whose role was limited to assisting with the harvest schedule, is not afforded immunity under the MMA. [read post]