Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS" Results 2521 - 2540 of 12,937
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2020, 5:08 pm
The date of a judgment entered prior to July 1, 2015 is computed in accordance with the Rules in effect when the judgment was entered.Turning next to relevant caselaw, the court cited its prior discussion (in Hiob v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by mes286
FIU College of Law– Hannibal Travis, Professor of Law, FIU College of Law, presents today, The United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
The federal government is active too, with the General Services Agency (GSA) fielding a network of sensors to manage buildings and the Department of Veteran Affairs developing wearable technology for healthcare applications.[1] On Capitol Hill, the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Geoff Schweller
The right of federal employees to criticize their agencies in the media was established in the 1995 Supreme Court Case Sanjour v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Writing for and editing pieces for The Review afforded me the opportunity to explore topics throughout the administrative state and hone an interest in environmental law—the field in which I now practice. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:54 pm by Stephen Sachs
Larry Solum has an interesting post on Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:54 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Strongsville, Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
Thus, instances of intervention by the Member States in the field of direct taxation, even if they concern issues that have not been harmonised in the European Union, are not excluded from the scope of the rules on State aid control».2)ID., para. 105. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:01 am by Julia Riechert
For employers who employ at least five employees, the statute provides that an employee who tests positive for COVID-19 on or after July 6, 2020, is entitled to a presumption that illness or death resulting from COVID-19 arose in the course of his or her employment, if: the employee tests positive for COVID-19 within 14 days of working at his or her place of employment; and the employee’s positive test occurs during a period of an “outbreak” at the employee’s specific place… [read post]