Search for: "State v. Allen" Results 2521 - 2540 of 3,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Mukasey, No. 05-4448 Petition for review of a decision denying petitioner asylum and related relief, and finding that he was removable due to a prior state conviction for possession of a controlled substance, is denied where a remand was unnecessary because petitioner's challenge to the state court conviction constituted an impermissible collateral attack, and he presented no other claims that would entitle him to relief. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
Hacked Off reminds readers that the Leveson system is not “state approved”. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Allen (1953), the state chief justices asked for legislative correction, and the idea had been proposed multiple times since. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
In discussing the jury role with respect to the issue of obviousness, the court stated in Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm by Melina Padron
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hassan Abdi and Afrah Khalaf [2010] EWHC 3083 (Admin) The Court of Appeal decided that time spent appealing against deportation counts in assessing whether an individual has been detained for an unreasonably long period. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O)   US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP Litigation… [read post]