Search for: "State v. Back" Results 2521 - 2540 of 42,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
Harlan worries that the amount under guidelines will set off an appeal in the Second Circuit.Harlan is right back to us on Saturday morning with this post concerning whether the Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:35 pm by Unknown
Forest County Potawatomi Community (Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
In Gabriele v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 239 A.D.2d 575, the Appellate Division considered the issue.Vincent Gabriele III began working for the Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority in 1985. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Kansas voters beat back a ballot question that would have rejected constitutional rights to abortion in the state constitution. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The court therefore concluded that the law must be set back on the correct footing which stood before Chan Wing-Siu. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
 It is a fun read, and nicely indexed so that the reader can easily find their way back the bit that they are trying to find. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
The conviction was almost three decades ago, back in 1981. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
Let the fun begin.Meanwhile, back in the appellate world, we get to decide fascinating questions of statutory interpretation. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:03 am by Wells Bennett
A little programming note here, y’all: today marks the first of a two-day, pre-trial hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 4:51 am
In Matter of Winston v Town of Bedford, Zoning Board of Appeals, (S.Ct., Westchester Co., Feb. 27, 2007), a New York state trial court upheld a decision of a zoning board that found a replica of an 8th century Mayan Temple in a couple's back yard violates Bedford, New York's zoning code. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
" United States v. [read post]