Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm
And a final-final USPTO decision can then be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:34 am
Last week’s ruling by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department, in Mizrahi v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:10 pm
D.N.H. 2006); Baxter v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am
As the Court of Appeals has stated, “[t]here is no uniform rule for valuing stock in closely held corporations. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
During the early stages of my legal career, I had the opportunity to work on a tragic case, Khan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
In June 2009, I wrote about a ruling by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of HMS Venture Management Corp. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:24 am
Interestingly, the opinion says this was “an issue of first impression in this court”, which I assume refers to the California Court of Appeals in general, rather than this particular district of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
District Court, plaintiff attempted to appeal to the Ninth Circuit but failed to follow procedure after I became the Assistant City Attorney in Redlands) what may or may not have been a Complaint in United States District Court from a sovereign citizen, what I called a constitutionalists in the past. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
State Policy v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2013 NY Slip Op 01117, Appellate Division, Third Department at http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2013/02/a-foil-request-seeking-names-of-public.html ** The First Department also noted the decision in New York Veteran Police Assn. v New York City Police Dept. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:43 am
There is language in a Supreme Court case, Clark County v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:27 pm
See River Vale Planning Bd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:04 am
Although conceding that “Well-settled principles of statutory construction lend support to the interpretation advanced by Policy,” the Appellate Division said that it was bound by the Court of Appeals' decision in Matter of New York Veteran Police Association. v New York City Police Dept. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
In Gunn v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:31 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 1989]). [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
(January 17, 2013), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Two) tackled that exact issue. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
(January 17, 2013), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Two) tackled that exact issue. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Jim and Linda achieve this in part by rescuing liberalism from the overdrawn depictions some of its critics deploy, and in part by rethinking some of the questions courts and legislatures increasingly confront in our now explicitly multiculturalist society.What I’ll focus on in this comment is not my many areas of agreement with Ordered Liberty’s critiques of other theories, but on a key element in its positive theory – the degree to which a liberal… [read post]