Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 37,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2023, 2:20 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:03 pm
Factors that Work Against Relocation In relocation disputes, as illustrated by Mackey v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The court granted vacatur under United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:55 am
And, in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 3:50 am
King v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 3:46 am
In Yates v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
Deportation was thus almost certain however he pled, so he might well have thought that a no context plea at least gives him some favor with the judge and reduces his sentence.Maybe not, of course. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:03 am
United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
In other words, 501(c)(7) organizations are not qualified for donor tax deduction because it is not described in §170(c).[11] “The tax code treats social clubs least favorably of all mutual benefit organizations”[12] because it serves only the members of the organization for a narrow recreational or interest purpose. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
While there, she gained fame for “saving” Major League Baseball with her strike-ending decision in Silverman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:33 pm
Here is a pdf copy of the Moseley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:13 am
More recently, the court in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
See NAACP v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:38 am
The defendants were convicted and, relying upon its own precedent in United States v. [read post]