Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
& whatever other item she is entitled too. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
What I did find was a 2007 Supreme Court decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
By way of example, there is already OHIM case law relating to designs used on toy cars as opposed to real cars (Supermarked A/S v Ferrari SPA, ICD 842, 13 November 2006), as well as a decision of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales relating to a design that can function as both a laundry aid, and a massage device (Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA 358). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
Thus, the federal property power is of little relevance. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:57 am
KG v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
As the territorial basis generally corresponds to a single Member State, television viewers can watch only the matches transmitted by the broadcasters established in the Member State where they reside. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am
They concern personal injury and damage to property. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 7:14 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
Below, is our short overview of some of these items. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am
Menzel v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:58 am
Preservation Action Council of San Jose v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 12:35 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 6:08 am
Rickey v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:05 am
Look at Finch v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:18 pm
Well, let's examine a case that will serve as a good illustration of these two charges: People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm
In Perquignot v. [read post]
