Search for: "State v. M. V."
Results 2521 - 2540
of 29,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2017, 11:57 am
[¶] I’m confident you have been granted pro per status. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 12:31 pm
But the judge got a big ol' Walmart gift card from the Fed Circuit today when that court affirmed his actions in the i4i v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
I'm not sure where this ruling leaves RSL. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:27 pm
Paul M. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:17 am
It’s too early to declare a trend, but I’m keeping an eye on this. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
Moreover, since what doctrinally counts as the "border" covers a fairly broad and important swath of the country (e.g., over 60 miles up the I-5 at the San Onofre checkpoint, thereby covering all of San Diego county -- home to several million, including some people about whom I profoundly care), I'm not sure I'm willing to create a broad exception to the Fourth Amendment for anyone in the "border" areas either.Still, if only as a rhetorical move, you… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
And, perhaps because of that, I'm hopeful that some state representative (or the Judicial Council) will use this opinion to change the law.But I also recognize that the Legislature is imperfect. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
On April 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
Donna M., No. 350284/07, N.Y. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 5:47 am
Case date: 04 June 2024 Case number: No. 23-1185 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 5:39 am
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number:No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 4:29 am
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number: No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 12:22 pm
I'm not so sure.Do I agree with Justice Ikola that the complaint here isn't subject to an anti-SLAPP motion? [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
See Upsolve Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
But in California, the state’s highest court enforced a surrogacy agreement in 1993, in Johnson v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:50 pm
In this regard, I think he's right about Rule 8, but wrong about Rule 3 -- and I'm fairly surprised by the failure of the opinion to discuss (or even cite) Walker v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:13 am
Only took a century or so to get rid of them (if I'm right). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:10 pm
The NPS v. [read post]
