Search for: "State v. Master"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 3,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
Coauthor, Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
It all comes down to the Decision [2012] EWCA Civ 48 of the Court of Appeal, and the IPKat can do no better than defer to the Master of the Rolls (MR) giving the leading judgement in explaining the background (in this post, italics refer to direct quotations from the Decision): 1. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 12:22 pm
In Morey v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am
al : LexisNexis, 2011 1 v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
Scout Masters have a great deal of independence in how they run their troops. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Claflin v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
[It] discusses TechSearch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
Coogan and Philips v News Group Newspapers [2012] EWCA Civ 48 -read judgment The Court of Appeal today dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:09 am
In resolving the dispute Master Bouck provided the following reasons summarizing the legal disclosure obligations (and dispute process) under Rule 7-1: [39] Biehl v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
In relation to the first issue, he began by noting that the only basis upon which it could be said that the information intercepted from the claimants’ phones constituted ‘intellectual property’ as defined in section 72(5) was if it was ‘technical or commercial information or other intellectual property’. [22] Lord Neuberger rejected the argument put forward by the Secretary of State (as an interested party) that “commercial information” should be… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:51 pm
It declared [[t]he state of] Liberty is in accord with the law of reason, for all men share liberty on the basis of natural law. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
The Daily Mail, which is being sued for an article published in 2010, reported that Rothschild “is seeking ‘very substantial damages’… over an article which he claims painted him as a ‘puppet-master’ willing to exploit his friendship with Mr Mandelson to impress his business associate Mr [Oleg] Deripaska”. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
In the (in)famous 1830 case of State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
The class named in the suit (Ernest Michael Bakenie v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am
United States, a wiretapping case. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm
” Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
In the Courts On 18 January 2012, HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of WXY v Gewanter (on an appeal from Master Eyre, after a private hearing). [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
John Hope Franklin, whose legacy Arcidiacono treads upon, provided research for Thurgood Marshall in the Brown v. [read post]
