Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 13,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
A shareholder class action alleging that the defendants falsely stated that a financial company maintained its principal executive offices in the United States in order to satisfy the criteria for inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index, a small cap stock market index, so as to allow the firm to maintain its listing on the Nasdaq moves on (Desta v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 11:14 am
Crouch Railway Consulting, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:16 pm
Truett Payne Co., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:36 pm
Supreme Court has issued a decision in the Goldman Sachs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC 14-623Issue: (1) Whether, where, as a result of a state-directed procurement, the contract price to build and operate a power plant is the developer’s bid price, and may result in payments beyond what the developer earns selling the plant’s capacity in the auction supervised by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the program is “field preempted” as a state’s attempt to set interstate wholesale rates;… [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
AOL Shopping has a Mac v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
In remarksat recent E.U. conference, he noted that the legal basis for deriving implied powers from the penumbra of other express powers is best seen in the opinion of Justice Douglas in Griswold v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
On 21 November, in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2012] UKSC 55, the UK Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals' order for the disclosure of the identities of individuals who had used an online ticketing website to sell and purchase international rugby tickets at inflated prices in breach of the Rugby Football Union’s (RFU) ticket terms and conditions. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:32 am
Youngblood v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Might as well be a baby driving...In his recent Luzerne County decision in the case of Gugliotti v. [read post]
BC Court: Aborted sale should have proceeded - vendor did not conceal property's propensity to flood
6 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
As stated by the Court: "The doctrine of caveat emptor applies in real estate transactions with respect to defects that are discoverable on reasonable inspection. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:16 am
Research Affiliates, LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2013] FCA 71* (13 February 2013)* At the time of writing, the decision is not yet published on AustLII. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 8:05 am
The Ninth Circuit opinion in Altera v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
In that case the Court upheld state fair trade laws, enforcing resale price maintenance contracts. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:15 am
ShareThe Supreme Court’s Monday decision in Goldman Sachs Group v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
The policy in Minnehaha County has since been modified by the state legislature. [read post]
