Search for: "State v. Risk" Results 2521 - 2540 of 28,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The second Mathews factor requires the Criminal Court to examine the risk of erroneous deprivation of the interest at stake as a result of the State's procedures and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute safeguards with respect to that interest. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As plaintiff has presented evidence that the risks and costs of his motorized wheelchair are relatively low (he pays for the wheelchair, for example) and wheelchair is safe, the State's defense "may be overstated. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 1:02 am
In prosecution of pharmacists for unlawful distribution of controlled substances, admission of portions of the Texas Pharmacy Laws and Regulations (TPLR) "clarify[ied] the scope and contour of criminal laws" and did not substitute a civil regulation for a criminal standard; in reviewing Due Process Claim, there was no plain error in admitting the TPLR evidence, in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
That's why criminal cases have captions like State of Ohio v. [read post]