Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 2521 - 2540
of 3,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 3:48 am
“(A) union is free to bargain away its members’ statutory rights when that bargain is expressly stated in the agreement,” a state Supreme Court Justice ruled in the Mancuso case. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:16 pm
It did not state the name of the landlord. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:16 pm
It did not state the name of the landlord. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:06 am
In 2003, the Austin Court of Appeals decided the case Taylor v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
He is available for comment on Michigan’s new auto accident law, McCormick v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:40 am
An arbitrator issued the decision after a disciplinary grievance hearing conducted in accordance with the provisions of a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:53 am
Taylor, Allstate Staff Counsel;Carmen M. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:32 am
The town also adopted procedures requiring (1) “timely notice” of any job-related injuries, (2) a time limit for appealing proposed light duty assignments and (3) a requirement that police officers claiming Section 207-c benefits charge any lost time to accumulated leave credits pending a determination of their eligibility for such benefits.A state Supreme Court justice upheld a PERB ruling that the town’s unilateral adoption of such policies and procedures constituted a… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
” In David Scott Detrich v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:44 pm
National banks and federal thrifts will be rolling up op subs into the mother ship faster than Taylor Lautner sheds his shirt. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 10:21 am
The case of Taylor v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 12:07 am
Pre-determination hearings not required unless a deprivation of a property or liberty interest is threatenedTaylor v NYS Dept. of Correctional Services, 248 A.D.2d 799A psychologist advised a correctional facility’s superintendent that State Corrections Officer Mark Taylor “was dangerous and may lose impulse control at any time. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
Alleged violations of a "Memorandum of Understanding" to a Taylor Law agreement may not be subject to contract grievance proceduresPine Plains CSD v Federation of Teachers, 248 A.D.2d 612It is not unusual for parties to a collective bargaining agreement to agree to provisions set out in a “supplemental agreement” or to sign a “memorandum of understanding” in the course of collective bargaining pursuant to the Taylor Law.Typically this… [read post]
