Search for: "U S Attorney"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 7,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 5:09 am
For our purposes, it’s not a JL § 487 case. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 6:34 am
Venture claimed that Sunoco’s patents were invalid because the inventors and their patent attorneys omitted certain information about sales that occurred prior to the filing date of the patents, and failed to disclose Venture’s invalidity and inequitable conduct arguments to the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 11:45 am
On March 16, 2018, Attorney Nicholas Kaltsas filed a similar lawsuit that was quickly consolidated with my case. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
For the continuous representation doctrine to apply, “there must be clear indicia of an ongoing, continuous, developing, and dependant relationship between the client and the attorney which often includes an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” (Luk Lamellen U. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:31 am
Attorney’s Office here in Boston. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
S. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 1:44 pm
The O/U is 56 and because of the weather, take the Under. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:33 pm
The earplugs were not long enough to be inserted properly into a soldier’s ears. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:45 am
Op. 33325(U) (Sup. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:52 am
Although firmly defeated, de Havilland’s attorneys told the Los Angeles Daily Journal that “Miss de Havilland hopes she will live to see the day when justice is done. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
Sure, the attorney made mistakes. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
Overturning the examining attorney’s rejection of Pitney's specimen of use, the Board reversed a refusal to register the mark shown here , for various mailing services.The examining attorney maintained that Pitney’s webpage specimen described a self-service kiosk that consumers use to mail and ship items but did not clearly indicate that applicant itself provided the subject services. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:58 am
I doubt that many persons who have reflected on the matter would choose to make a sitting U. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:31 am
That’s the basic lesson of 97 2nd LLC v Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 30021(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154593/2018 Judge: Arlene P. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:18 pm
At The Antitrust Attorney Blog, we have discussed state-action immunity quite a bit (as suing state and local governments under the antitrust laws is a favorite topic of mine). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 10:20 am
FINRA’s By-Laws, specifically Article V, Section 2(c) require all financial advisors update their U-4 with information required to be disclosed within thirty days of learning of the event requiring the disclosure. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:53 pm
” There was no justification, in Judge Young’s view, for treating a plaintiff and defendant differently when it comes to moving a case forward. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
While exculpatory agreements have applied to escrow agents who were not attorneys (see Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC v SDI, Inc., 2014 WL 3670674, *4 [Sup Ct, NY County 2014]), these agreements are disfavored as to attorneys, particularly when the attorney drafted the agreement with the exculpatory provision (see Galasso, Langione, & Batter, LLP v Galasso, 53 Misc 3d 1202[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51308[U], n 50 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2016]). [read post]
