Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 2521 - 2540 of 7,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
  Read comments and post your comment TTABlog comment: The cost-shifting of Rule 2.123(c) was also the subject of the recent precedential decision in United States Postal Service v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142-43 (9th Cir. 2010) (finding the expenses incurred by attorney for lodging and meals during oral argument and post-argument mediation to be “necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of petitioner); Dawson, 2014 WL 4748512, at * 8 (awarding petitioner expenses for, inter alia, the cost of a private investigator to locate the abducted children in the United States); Saldivar v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 2:16 pm by Marta Requejo
Prime riflessioni) Carlos Manuel Díez Soto, Algunas cuestiones a propósito del derecho de participación del autor de una obra de arte original sobre el precio de reventa (droit de suite) (Some questions concerning the artist’s resale right (droit de suite) Dorothy Estrada Tanck, Protección de las personas migrantes indocumentadas en España con arreglo al Derecho Internacional y Europeo de los derechos humanos (Protection of undocumented migrant persons in… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Reproductive Health Services, which gave greater leeway to the states to restrict abortion, and Rust v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
”  Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:09 am by Steve Lubet
It goes far deeper than that and has much more significant implications for freedom of religion in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In the 6-3 majority decision, Justice Lewis Powell said Massachusetts couldn’t jail a man for wearing small cloth version of the United States flag sewn to the seat of his jeans. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:07 pm
 Judge Clifton begins the thing with a nice little summary:"It is a crime to produce outside the United States a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and to then transport that visual depiction into the United States. 18 U.S.C. [read post]