Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 2521 - 2540 of 10,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Cori Alonso-Yoder discusses last week’s decision in Sessions v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm by Kiran Bhat
§ 1605(a)(2), requires evidence that a "legally significant act" occurred within the United States to vest U.S. courts with jurisdiction over a foreign sovereign.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (11th Circuit)Petition for certiorari [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:47 am by Ashley J. Remillard
Mar. 30, 2013), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia denied a joint motion for a consent decree regarding the critical habitat designation for the Washington, Oregon and California (tri-state) population of the marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus). [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm by Mark Walsh
PHILADELPHIA, September 19, 1794 — Your correspondent has traveled from the budding City of Washington in the Territory of Columbia to our nation’s capital here to cover a rare jury trial in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
This list includes (among others) (i) publicly traded companies, (ii) 501(c) tax exempt entities under the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) certain pooled investment vehicles, (iv) any entity that (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States, (b) filed in the previous year's federal income tax returns more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales in the aggregate (including the receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and other… [read post]
 Glacier also contends that the Supreme Court of Washington’s decision conflicts with United States Supreme Court precedent including that labor law does not deprive an employer of their legal rights to possession and protection of their property. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:34 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am by WIMS
It's snowy and cold today in the Eastern United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: 521 E. 5th LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am by Jay Willis
” Robert Barnes at the Washington Post recaps yesterday’s decision in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
The brief several times cites to the formulations by Chief Justice Rehnquist in Washington v. [read post]