Search for: "ALL POTENTIAL CLAIMANTS" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,873
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
To be sure, all the statistics suggest that the odds of a grant start falling off around the third relist. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
Himmelreich 15-109Issue: Whether a final judgment in an action brought under Section 1346(b) dismissing the claim on the ground that relief is precluded by one of the Federal Tort Claims Act’s exceptions to liability, 28 U.S.C. 2680, bars a subsequent action by the claimant against the federal employees whose acts gave rise to the FTCA claim. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   [Actually, it does: ADT is a “third party” relative to Capital Connect’s representations to potential customers. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:40 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
However, by forfeiting the right to civil litigation, potential claimants lose a number of important rights. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, in other cases, the motivation was purely financial, because the massive aggregation of litigants’ damages that the class action procedures facilitated massively increased the potential rewards for the lawyers bringing the cases. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 8:30 am by Andy
Claimant's 'Chantilly' designDefendant's 'Richmond' designHaving established that the defendant had had access to the claimant's designs, it might seem that all the court had to do was assess the extent to which the one design copied the other. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by Jan von Hein
If this case is referred to the Court of the European Union, it will have the potential of becoming a landmark case. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  All of the exclusions in §2 are content-based. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm by Adam Klein, Mira Rapp-Hooper
According to the U.S. interpretation, all ships are allowed to pass through the 200 nm EEZ and 12 nm territorial sea of a coastal state without obtaining prior permission. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:00 am
" The provisions also have the potential to be very powerful in addressing these concerns in the future. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Himmelreich 15-109Issue: Whether a final judgment in an action brought under Section 1346(b) dismissing the claim on the ground that relief is precluded by one of the Federal Tort Claims Act’s exceptions to liability, 28 U.S.C. 2680, bars a subsequent action by the claimant against the federal employees whose acts gave rise to the FTCA claim. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Without the court costs incentive, the whole recognition process painstakingly agreed by all three parties and by Parliament becomes virtually worthless. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:02 am by Kit Case
Beyond higher prices, greater demand will also lead to longer treatment and recovery times as claimants wait to get appointments, potentially impacting indemnity costs. 2. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
  The decision was, nevertheless, controversial as the all the claimants were awarded more than the previous highest damages in a privacy case (the £60,000 paid to Max Mosley in 2008. [read post]