Search for: "ANDERSON V. STATE"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 2,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2008, 7:06 pm
Arthur Anderson. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Anderson took a different spin on the "Making Book" article in the November 2007 issue of DRI's For The Defense. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:25 pm
Chief Justice Steele: The AFSME v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
Robert Phillips, No. 96,754 (Sedgwick)State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:57 pm
Last week, I reported on the Sixth Circuit decision in VanHook v Anderson recognizing that post-Strickland decisions from the United States Supreme Court have tightened the duty of investigation required by defense counsel. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:03 am
Chief Justice Steele: The AFSME v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
(Australian Patent Law), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IPRoo), Australia concludes ASEAN-Australia-New-Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA) Negotiations: (Australian Trade Marks Law) Patents: the need for useful results: Milton Edgar Anderson: (IPRoo) Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina prepares for closer ties with EU: Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters: (Class 46) Brazil Luxury goods sales soar in Brazil, as recession bites old… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
In VanHook v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
For the purpose of marketing, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service issued a voluntary standard for grass (forage) fed marketing claims last year that states: “grass fed standard states that grass and/or forage shall be the feed source consumed for the lifetime of the ruminant animal, with the exception of milk consumed prior to weaning. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
The MBTA sued the students and MIT in United States District Court in Massachusetts. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 1:45 pm
The MBTA sued the students and MIT in United States District Court in Massachusetts. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Willie Anderson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
See In re Enron, at *2 and Newby v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
MARIA ISABEL LERMA, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., No. 08-0032 JAMES ANDERSON, PATRICIA ANDERSON, JACK CROWDER, CATHY CROWDER, GARY DZYAK, GEORGE ROSEMEIER, EVELYN ROSEMEIER, TOBY SIMMONS, AND PEGGY SIMMONS v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
In Raymond Edwards, II v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]