Search for: "Anderson v. State" Results 2541 - 2560 of 2,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Anderson took a different spin on the "Making Book" article in the November 2007 issue of DRI's For The Defense. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
Robert Phillips, No. 96,754 (Sedgwick)State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:57 pm by stu@crimapp.com
Last week, I reported on the Sixth Circuit decision in VanHook v Anderson recognizing that post-Strickland decisions from the United States Supreme Court have tightened the duty of investigation required by defense counsel. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
 (Australian Patent Law), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IPRoo), Australia concludes ASEAN-Australia-New-Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA) Negotiations: (Australian Trade Marks Law) Patents: the need for useful results: Milton Edgar Anderson: (IPRoo)   Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina prepares for closer ties with EU: Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters: (Class 46)   Brazil Luxury goods sales soar in Brazil, as recession bites old… [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
For the purpose of marketing, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service issued a voluntary standard for grass (forage) fed marketing claims last year that states: “grass fed standard states that grass and/or forage shall be the feed source consumed for the lifetime of the ruminant animal, with the exception of milk consumed prior to weaning. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
The MBTA sued the students and MIT in United States District Court in Massachusetts. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 1:45 pm by Legal Talk Network
The MBTA sued the students and MIT in United States District Court in Massachusetts. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
MARIA ISABEL LERMA, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., No. 08-0032 JAMES ANDERSON, PATRICIA ANDERSON, JACK CROWDER, CATHY CROWDER, GARY DZYAK, GEORGE ROSEMEIER, EVELYN ROSEMEIER, TOBY SIMMONS, AND PEGGY SIMMONS v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]